TL;DR
Turn quiet afternoons into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
A Being Patient report describes a DEXA scan estimating the writer’s visceral fat and reviews research connecting fat stored deep in the abdomen with high blood pressure. Separate research has linked untreated high blood pressure with higher Alzheimer’s risk, but the material does not show that a fat measurement can predict an individual’s brain health.
A Being Patient report has examined whether visceral fat—fat stored deep in the abdomen around internal organs—could relate to brain health, describing a personal DEXA scan and research connecting visceral fat with high blood pressure. The evidence discussed points to a possible indirect link through vascular health; it does not establish that a scan can diagnose brain problems or predict an individual’s dementia risk.
Being Patient founder Deborah Kan said she paid about $50 for a DEXA scan at a local scanning business. The scan took about seven minutes, and its report estimated she had 0.41 pounds of visceral fat. It also compared her result with 27,000 people in her age group, placing her in the group with the lowest visceral-fat levels. Kan noted that people who pay for body scans may not represent the wider population.
The report distinguishes DEXA from MRI: the DEXA scan provided an estimate of total visceral fat, while an MRI can show where the fat is located. The scan report linked visceral fat with risks including heart disease, type 2 diabetes and some cancers. Those statements describe associations and general health risks; Kan’s individual result does not show what caused it or what it means for her future health.
For evidence about blood pressure, the report cited a University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center study that followed 903 people in Dallas for seven years. Participants began with normal blood pressure, and researchers used imaging to assess fat distribution. About one-quarter developed high blood pressure. Body weight predicted who developed it, but after researchers accounted for fat location, visceral fat was the only fat type still associated with the outcome, according to the report.
The Link Runs Through Blood Pressure
The potential relevance to brain health is indirect. High blood pressure can damage blood vessels around the brain, while the report also cites a 2024 study of more than 31,000 older adults across 14 countries. That study associated untreated high blood pressure with a 42 percent higher chance of developing Alzheimer’s. The report says that extra risk was not seen among people whose blood pressure was controlled.
Together, these findings put attention on a chain of possible risk: visceral fat may be associated with developing high blood pressure, and untreated high blood pressure has been associated with Alzheimer’s risk. They do not establish that belly fat directly causes Alzheimer’s, or that reducing a particular person’s visceral fat will prevent dementia. For readers, the practical point raised by the report is that blood pressure is a measurable health factor with relevance to vascular and brain health.
Products Worth Considering
Ring Battery Doorbell (2nd Gen) and Indoor Cam Plus Bundle, Matte Mocha and Black
Sony BRAVIA 5 85-Inch Mini LED 4K HDR Smart TV (K-85XR50)
Philips Hue Secure Wired Video Doorbell, 2K, Black
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Scan Can—and Cannot—Show
Kan’s report is a first-person account and research review, not a clinical study of her scan results. Her 0.41-pound estimate is one person’s measurement; it cannot establish whether running contributed to the result. Nor does the comparison with other scan customers provide a population-wide benchmark, since the people being compared may be unusually health-conscious.
The report also cites research suggesting that fat around the kidneys could affect the development of hypertension, while noting that more research is needed to understand that relationship. Geriatrician Nate Chin, medical director of the Wisconsin Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, told Kan that monitoring blood pressure is the best available “window” into brain health. He recommended checking it at home a few times a week and keeping it in the normal range, which he described as below 120 over 80.
““I thought I would start with the overall numbers.””
— Deborah Kan, Being Patient founder
What a Fat Estimate Cannot Predict
The evidence summarized in the report does not show whether visceral fat directly affects brain health, or whether it chiefly matters through conditions such as hypertension. The Dallas study found an association with later high blood pressure, not proof that visceral fat caused it. The Alzheimer’s finding is also an association and does not mean that every person with untreated hypertension will develop the disease.
It is also unclear how accurately consumer devices estimate visceral fat or how useful a single DEXA result is for making personal health decisions. The report offers no clinical interpretation of Kan’s scan and does not establish a target amount of visceral fat for individuals. Further research is needed on fat around the kidneys and its relationship with blood pressure.
Blood Pressure Is the Practical Follow-Up
Kan said she plans to pay attention to regular blood-pressure checks, rather than pursue an unrealistic goal of having no visceral fat. Chin’s advice, as reported in the article, was to use a home cuff several times a week and aim for readings below 120 over 80. Individual readings and targets can vary, so people with questions about their measurements should discuss them with a qualified health professional.
The research questions remain open: future work would need to clarify whether visceral fat itself contributes to hypertension, how fat location affects that relationship and whether changing visceral-fat levels changes later brain-health outcomes. For now, the report supports treating a DEXA scan as an estimate—not a brain-health test—and blood pressure as the more directly monitorable factor it highlights.
Key Questions
No conclusion like that is supported by the report. It describes research linking visceral fat with high blood pressure and separate research associating untreated high blood pressure with Alzheimer’s risk. These are not findings that a fat scan predicts an individual’s outcome.
What did the DEXA scan measure?
In Kan’s account, the DEXA scan estimated the amount of visceral fat, reporting 0.41 pounds. The report says MRI can show where visceral fat is located, while the DEXA scan provided an estimate of the total.
What did the Dallas study find?
Researchers followed 903 people for seven years; all began with normal blood pressure, and about one-quarter developed high blood pressure. According to the report, visceral fat remained associated with that outcome after accounting for fat location. The result does not by itself prove causation.
What health measure does the report emphasize?
The report emphasizes blood-pressure monitoring, citing a clinician’s recommendation to check it at home a few times a week. A personal target or treatment plan should be discussed with a qualified health professional.
Source: rss
