TL;DR
Turn quiet afternoons into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
A Tiny Buddha essay recounts how its author used self-care, meditation and ideas from Morita therapy to respond differently to anxiety. The author says anxiety has not disappeared, and the report is a personal account rather than evidence that the approach works for everyone.
Tiny Buddha published a personal account of how its author changed their response to persistent anxiety, describing a move from trying to feel better before acting to accepting distress while continuing with daily tasks. The essay presents the change as one person’s experience, not as clinical evidence that acceptance or meditation treats anxiety.
The writer says anxiety intensified in 2019, after a 15-year relationship ended, they moved home and started a new job. They describe waking around 3 a.m. most nights for more than a year, with racing thoughts about work, finances and being alone. The essay also recounts fatigue, loss of interest and difficulty functioning at work.
Rather than setting a deadline for recovery, the author says they began with small acts of self-care, then gradually took up meditation. They report sitting three to five times a week, increasing sessions from five minutes to as long as 40 minutes. About a year into the practice, they say they noticed anxiety as an experience they could observe, rather than something that defined them.
The essay connects that perspective to Morita therapy, which its author describes as emphasizing acceptance of feelings and action within one’s control. The writer says the goal is not to make anxiety vanish: they remain highly sensitive and sometimes still wake during the night, but say they respond differently when distress appears.
Acceptance Without Waiting for Calm
The essay speaks to a common tension in accounts of anxiety: people may postpone ordinary decisions or activities until they feel calm, while efforts to force a feeling away can become another source of distress. The author’s account offers a different personal framing—allow the feeling to be present and take a manageable next step anyway.
That distinction matters because the piece does not claim acceptance cures anxiety. Its significance is as a first-person description of coping and changed self-understanding. Readers may find the account relatable, but it cannot establish how effective the approach is for others or replace individualized mental-health care.
Products Worth Considering
Ring Battery Doorbell (1st Gen), 2-Pack, Satin Nickel
Bose TV Speaker Compact Soundbar with Bluetooth and HDMI-ARC, Black
Blueair Blue Pure 511i Max Air Purifier for Home and Bedroom
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
From Personal Crisis to Morita Therapy
The writer traces the crisis to several major changes occurring close together in 2019: the end of a long relationship, a move and a new job. They say they had long been sensitive to other people’s judgments, replaying conversations and treating social interactions as tests. Their background studying psychology did not, they write, make it easy to seek or act on support when their own wellbeing worsened.
After trying self-help material and meditation, the author encountered a book about Morita therapy, named for Japanese psychiatrist Shoma Morita. The essay describes the approach through the Japanese term arugamama, rendered there as accepting things as they are while taking action. The source provides no clinical study, independent expert assessment or detailed information about the book that introduced the writer to the therapy.
““I stopped treating healing like a project with a deadline.””
— The essay’s author
Limits of One Personal Account
The source is a first-person essay, and the supplied material does not include a publication date, a clinical assessment of the author, or evidence measuring changes in symptoms. It is not clear whether the writer received professional treatment or what other factors may have shaped their experience.
The essay also does not establish that meditation or Morita therapy will have the same effects for other people. Its claims about how feelings respond to acceptance are the author’s interpretation of personal experience and therapy concepts, not independently verified conclusions in the material provided.
What the Essay Leaves Open
The source material does not announce a follow-up study, clinical trial or additional reporting, and it gives no specific next publication or event. The account ends with the writer describing ongoing practice and continuing sensitivity, rather than claiming a final recovery.
Any broader assessment of Morita therapy or meditation would require evidence beyond this essay, such as clinical research and qualified professional evaluation. The author’s reported experience can inform readers about one person’s coping approach, while its limits remain central to interpreting the claims.
Key Questions
What change does the essay describe?
The author says they shifted from trying to eliminate anxiety before living normally to accepting that it was present while carrying on with manageable daily actions.
Does the author say anxiety went away?
No. The writer says they remain highly sensitive and sometimes wake at night. They describe a change in how they respond to anxiety, not its complete disappearance.
What is Morita therapy in the account?
The essay describes Morita therapy as an approach associated with accepting feelings that cannot be controlled and choosing actions that can be taken. The supplied material does not include an independent clinical review of the method.
Does this account show that acceptance or meditation works for everyone?
No. It is a personal narrative, not a clinical study or evidence that the approach has the same effect for other people. Mental-health decisions should be discussed with a qualified professional.
Source: rss
