TL;DR
Turn quiet afternoons into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
Sixty and Me published an installment in its “Rewriting the Rules of Aging” series focused on ageism and five practices for challenging internalized age stereotypes. The suggestions include self-care, reframing beliefs, seeking positive media portrayals, creative expression and reflecting on personal growth; the article does not report new research testing these practices.
Sixty and Me has published an installment in its “Rewriting the Rules of Aging” series that defines ageism and sets out five personal practices for readers over 60 who want to challenge negative beliefs about growing older. The article presents these as ways to change how people view themselves and aging, rather than as findings from a newly reported study.
The article defines ageism as prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination based on age. It argues that messages portraying older people as slow, undesirable, obsolete or unable to use technology can affect how people understand life after 60. The piece says such portrayals appear across news and entertainment media, advertising and other public narratives.
Its five suggestions are to practice self-love and self-care; identify and reframe limiting assumptions about aging; seek and share positive, varied portrayals of older people; pursue creative activities such as writing, gardening, dance or music; and reflect on personal growth with self-compassion. Examples include walking or stretching, journaling, and repeating affirmations. These are recommendations from the article’s author, not reported clinical guidance.
The piece frames the practices as an inward starting point for challenging ageism. It also acknowledges that ageism operates socially, while arguing that changing one’s own response to aging is part of changing the broader narrative. The source does not provide outcome data showing how effective any of the five practices are.
Personal Beliefs and Age Stereotypes
The article focuses on a dimension of ageism that can be less visible than discrimination in workplaces, services or healthcare: internalized assumptions about what people can do or how they should feel as they grow older. For readers over 60, questioning those assumptions may offer a way to respond to discouraging messages without accepting them as facts about every older person.
Its advice also puts responsibility on individuals, though personal practices alone cannot resolve structural discrimination or replace institutional change. The story is best understood as a set of suggestions for self-reflection, not evidence that ageism can be eliminated through individual effort alone.
Products Worth Considering

Roborock Q7 M5+ Robot Vacuum and Mop with Self-Emptying Dock

Ring Alarm 8-Piece Kit (2nd Gen) Home Security System

eufy Security 5-Piece Home Alarm Kit
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Series’ Approach to Aging
The installment is part of Sixty and Me’s five-part series, “Rewriting the Rules of Aging.” The preceding installment, according to the article, discussed where those rules are found and the role of self-love. This piece turns to the meaning of ageism and ways to challenge its influence on personal beliefs.
The article also refers to social scientists Elaine Cumming and William Henry, whose 1961 book, “Growing Old,” presented disengagement theory: the idea that aging involves a mutual withdrawal between older people and their social systems. It notes that physician and gerontologist Robert Butler coined the term “ageism” in 1969. The author uses this history to discuss messages that can equate aging with withdrawing from life; the article does not provide a new historical or scientific review.
“Ageism refers to prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination against individuals based on their age.”
— Sixty and Me article
Evidence Behind the Five Practices
The source does not state when the article was published, identify research evaluating these five recommendations, or quantify how common the experiences it describes are. It also does not establish that media exposure alone causes negative self-perceptions, or that the suggested activities reduce the effects of ageism. The practices should be read as the author’s recommendations, not proven outcomes.
The piece acknowledges ageism as a social issue but does not set out policy proposals or measures for changing institutional practices. How individual reflection might connect to broader changes is left open.
The Series Turns to Generations
The author says the next installment will examine the origins of conflict between generations and ways to address it peacefully. The article also invites readers to watch an accompanying video and share experiences of ageism in daily life and on social media. The source gives no date for the next installment.
Key Questions
What is the article’s main development?
Sixty and Me published a series installment that defines ageism and proposes five practices for challenging negative beliefs about aging from within.
What five practices does it recommend?
It recommends self-care, reframing limiting beliefs, positive media representation, creative expression and reflecting on personal growth.
Does the article report that these practices have been proven effective?
No. It offers them as recommendations and does not report study results or outcome data testing their effectiveness.
What is planned for the next installment?
The author says the next part of the series will discuss the origins of generational conflict and approaches to resolving it peacefully. No publication date is given.
Source: sixtyandme.com
